• Page :
  • 1
  • Text Only

add to cart for $549.01
$80.01 off in cart
$469.00
Free Shipping
Text


  • Also categorized in:
    • Manufacturer › LG

Great deal !!


FYI,

I purchased this set about four months ago from Frys when they were running a deal for the set and two pairs of active 3D glasses for $399.

I don't use the 3d much although it does appear to work well with my DirectTV 3D stations.

At $400-500, I consider the set a good deal for a low price 42" inch set. Don't let the 720 resolution scare you off.

The glasses were worth $65/pair (each) at Frys

Unless you will be setting closer than 5 feet from the screen, you won't notice the difference from 1080P.

The glasses are active versus passive,rechargeable and comfortable.

I would prefer this set to most of the low-end 40-42 LCD/LED's that you see around for about %500.

Not as good as a $700-$1000 set, but no where near the price.

I believe that the current issue of Consumer Reports TV's this month. This set rated low compared to the high end sets, but not terrible.

A friend at work picked up a Samsung 43D450 plasma for $350 recently and is quite happy with that set.

Again a reasonable picture at a cheap price.


Full HD 1080: No
Native Display Resolution: 1024 x 768p


CradleRobber said:   FYI,

I purchased this set about four months ago from Frys when they were running a deal for the set and two pairs of active 3D glasses for $399.

I don't use the 3d much although it does appear to work well with my DirectTV 3D stations.

At $400-500, I consider the set a good deal for a low price 42" inch set. Don't let the 720 resolution scare you off.

The glasses were worth $65/pair (each) at Frys

Unless you will be setting closer than 5 feet from the screen, you won't notice the difference from 1080P.

The glasses are active versus passive,rechargeable and comfortable.

I would prefer this set to most of the low-end 40-42 LCD/LED's that you see around for about %500.

Not as good as a $700-$1000 set, but no where near the price.

I believe that the current issue of Consumer Reports TV's this month. This set rated low compared to the high end sets, but not terrible.

A friend at work picked up a Samsung 43D450 plasma for $350 recently and is quite happy with that set.

Again a reasonable picture at a cheap price.

Thanks for the input. Decided to pick one up. 399 would've been a steal, but no tax and free shipping will help a little.


it does not read like 1080p.


Not knocking the deal, but this is a 720p set and not a 1080p set. Please fix the title OP.




Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.


While FatWallet makes every effort to post correct information, offers are subject to change without notice.
Some exclusions may apply based upon merchant policies.
© 1999-2012