A lot of us knew that when Bing was alive, you could click through it first, then clickthrough a second CashBack site to a retailer and make a purchase and CashBack would post at Bing and the other CashBack network. With eBay, you could add in 2% Ebucks, and at other stores, you could add in thier own rewards program cards, ect. Finally, you could add in cc CashBack. If you were even more savvy, you could buy an AMEX GC with your cc and earn even more CashBack on the final purchase. If you were among the CashBack savings elite, you would use the AMEX GC to buy a discounted retialer gift card to the retailer you are planning on shopping at, of course earning CashBack on that purchase as well. In the end, if you played your cards right, it was not unusal to see CashBack rates up to 40%-50%, and perhaps much higher, in total, from the various payees. Unfortuantely, Bing is dead, and as far as I'm aware, no other "click-through" CashBack site out there currently functions like Bing to allow it to be the first clickthrough in a chain and still post CashBack. Now, only the last clickthrough that opens the actual window you checkout in will post CashBack.
I realize this info might be sensitive, and I debated for a long time about posting the idea here publically, but at this point, I see little to lose in asking if anyone has any insight. At a minimum, I'd like to find out how Bing tracked CashBack vs all the other CashBack networks out there that allowed it to not be the last clickthrough and still post. My guess is Bing used a cookies/session tracking method, while all the other CashBack networks use some sort of embedded/hidden URL tracking methodlogy. If nothing else, I'd like to learn how the networks track CashBack. Then, we can go from there...
If you have something sensitive you wish to ask me or discuss, and don't feel like posting it publically, please PM me. Otherwise, I think the FW community as a whole would benefit if someone could explain this process, and find the loopholes...
My guess is that all cb websites use the referral system that the online store supports, and each store only supports a single method (like commission junction), which is why it's impossible to stack them. Bing probably developed their own referral system and the online stores never considered limiting cb to a single referrer, inadvertently allowing double dipping.
atomicnebula
New Member
posted: Sep. 3, 2010 @ 2:34a
Yeah, Microsoft created their own tracking system for Bing CashBack. All other CashBack sites appear to use the same tracking system, thus eliminating any possibility of stacking. If you're interested in the technical details, both systems worked by sending you through tracking servers that would set cookies/initialize sessions as appropriate. However, the Bing servers were different from those used by other sites, so you ended up with two separate sets of tracking data instead of just one.
It's worth noting that getting Bing to stack wasn't a sure bet either. Some retailers (Barnes and Noble comes to mind) were set up to support only one tracking system at a time, so there wasn't any opportunity for stacking to begin with.
Crazytree
Senior Member - 7K
posted: Sep. 3, 2010 @ 2:39a
I can barely get FW to honor its clickthroughs... the idea of multiple clickthroughs sounds like crazytalk!
First AOR died, then Bing, now, when I go to Staples they decline my coupons because it says "..to which no other cpn or INSTANT SAVINGS.." (without IS items are too expensive most of the time), or they make me wait while they check the validity of the cpn.., eBay/PPL fees have gone through the roof making even AC/AR deals not worth the effort. Happy Days are over.
aaron27
Member
posted: Sep. 3, 2010 @ 6:58a
I used to be able to supplement my income by picking up good deals online and reselling them on eBay, cashing in FF miles for Gift Cards and selling on eBay for cash, or picking up free things online (through programs like ClubBing/Club Live) and selling. It was always a little tedious, but kind of fun because you're picking up extra cash.
eBay and PayPal operate as a total racket, now. They crowded out competing services and then jacked up fees the first chance they got. It might not legally fall under antitrust violations, but it sure seems similar. To sell one item, you have to pay one company (the eBay/PayPal racket) three sets of fees. Listing fee, final value fee, and PayPal transaction fee. Then, to protect yourself you have to pay the USPS extra for a tracking number. Otherwise the buyer will take receipt and claim you never shipped and without that tracking number, PayPal will take back the funds. Despite all the hurdles, it was still marginally worth it before. Now with huge fees, it doesn't make any sense at all.
The only positive is that this awful system should create demand for a lower-cost alternative. Google, Microsoft, and even Facebook should highly consider getting into online auctions.
Crazytree said: I can barely get FW to honor its clickthroughs... the idea of multiple clickthroughs sounds like crazytalk! Yeah, they screwed me out of CB from Priceline on 3 flights I booked because they said I had clicked through Kayak to book the flight. I had clicked through Kayak....12 hours prior. Their suggestion was to clear all cookies before clicking through their links. Yeah, OK.
spcatcham
Member
posted: Sep. 3, 2010 @ 8:32a
And coincidentally, the only feasible competitor to PayPal, eGold, which violated their own privacy agreement to help the feds got a bad rap after being busted by them...so now we are left in PayPal world...
MikeR397 said: A lot of us knew that when Bing was alive, you could click through it first, then clickthrough a second CashBack site to a retailer and make a purchase and CashBack would post at Bing and the other CashBack network.
Well, I do now. Great timing
MikeR397
Senior Member - 3K
posted: Sep. 3, 2010 @ 9:19a
LordKronos said: MikeR397 said: A lot of us knew that when Bing was alive, you could click through it first, then clickthrough a second CashBack site to a retailer and make a purchase and CashBack would post at Bing and the other CashBack network.
Well, I do now. Great timing Well, at least you know now to : (1) Buy AMEX GC and earn clickthrough CashBack and cc CashBack (2) use AMEX GC to buy discounted retailer gift card (watch paypal's 15 cc lifetime added cc limit, so dont' use AMEX GC at Paypal probably) (3) redeem retailer gift card with clickthrough CashBack and (4) utilize any potential retail rewards incentives, like Sears' "shopyourwayrewards" for 1% CashBack at Sears (many retailers have programs like this).
I call this a "serial CashBack stack." I am just hoping to find more intermediate CashBack earning steps to juice things up more...
i do something similar with my hotel stays. go through FW to get hotel GC with FW CB. reserve room through FW for FW CB. pay with GC, bought with CC with CB. 3 CB opportunities for the same hotel stay. i do a lot of traveling, using OPM, so this is a nice benefit. i recently negotiated a new rate, about 40% off, directly with the hotel so i can't use FW CB, but still can get GC with FW CB and CC CB.
(until the end of the year) you can book a trip on Expedia and get Thank You points + Cash Back or points on the credit card + mileage from whatever airline you fly. Not the best deal but at least you get triple points.
djspray said: Crazytree said: I can barely get FW to honor its clickthroughs... the idea of multiple clickthroughs sounds like crazytalk! Yeah, they screwed me out of CB from Priceline on 3 flights I booked because they said I had clicked through Kayak to book the flight. I had clicked through Kayak....12 hours prior. Their suggestion was to clear all cookies before clicking through their links. Yeah, OK.
Well simple fact is FW is at the mercy of the vendors. If they say you got there some other way then there really is no way for them to fight it. They pay based on what they get from the companies. I'm sure FW does push the companies as much as possible to honor the referrals and not pull junk like having a link you clicked take away their referral because if you didn't get paid then neither did they.
That said I usually find what I want in firefox then i open IE directly to fatwallet and click through there and only do what is needed to buy the product. Seems to work pretty well.
You also could use firefox private browsing mode to do something similar.
djspray said: Crazytree said: I can barely get FW to honor its clickthroughs... the idea of multiple clickthroughs sounds like crazytalk! Yeah, they screwed me out of CB from Priceline on 3 flights I booked because they said I had clicked through Kayak to book the flight. I had clicked through Kayak....12 hours prior. Their suggestion was to clear all cookies before clicking through their links. Yeah, OK.
If that's what they said, that's what happened.
It's a very simple bottom line when it comes to paying out for CashBack. If we get paid, you get paid.
The angle here is to get more than 1 CashBack site to get paid for the same transaction, so they in turn will both pay the customer
allegro54
Member
posted: Sep. 3, 2010 @ 11:53p
The problem with new auction sites is that they don't generate the traffic eBay does. If fewer people see your auction, you're less likely to sell, and, if you do, you're more likely to get a lower price.
Here's a new site that's been advertised in my local newspaper:
Newspapers are giving them free advertising and when people buy from boocoo and input a zip code in the newspaper's service area, the newspaper gets a commission. It's sort of like click through in the print media.
BMWLVR82 said: djspray said: Crazytree said: I can barely get FW to honor its clickthroughs... the idea of multiple clickthroughs sounds like crazytalk! Yeah, they screwed me out of CB from Priceline on 3 flights I booked because they said I had clicked through Kayak to book the flight. I had clicked through Kayak....12 hours prior. Their suggestion was to clear all cookies before clicking through their links. Yeah, OK.
If that's what they said, that's what happened.
It's a very simple bottom line when it comes to paying out for CashBack. If we get paid, you get paid.
mr moderator,
not necessarily. if what you say is true then mathematically there is a chance FW could get paid but we would not.
flypaper
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Sep. 5, 2010 @ 1:43a
BMWLVR82 said: djspray said: Crazytree said: I can barely get FW to honor its clickthroughs... the idea of multiple clickthroughs sounds like crazytalk! Yeah, they screwed me out of CB from Priceline on 3 flights I booked because they said I had clicked through Kayak to book the flight. I had clicked through Kayak....12 hours prior. Their suggestion was to clear all cookies before clicking through their links. Yeah, OK.
If that's what they said, that's what happened.
It's a very simple bottom line when it comes to paying out for CashBack. If we get paid, you get paid.
They being Kayak or FatWallet? The system isn't perfect on either end.
flypaper said: BMWLVR82 said: djspray said: Crazytree said: I can barely get FW to honor its clickthroughs... the idea of multiple clickthroughs sounds like crazytalk! Yeah, they screwed me out of CB from Priceline on 3 flights I booked because they said I had clicked through Kayak to book the flight. I had clicked through Kayak....12 hours prior. Their suggestion was to clear all cookies before clicking through their links. Yeah, OK.
If that's what they said, that's what happened.
It's a very simple bottom line when it comes to paying out for CashBack. If we get paid, you get paid.
They being Kayak or FatWallet? The system isn't perfect on either end.They being the merchant. Someone's referal info is included with the order, that's who gets paid the referal commission.
I'm fairly certain that stacking would only be successful if you could trick the second CashBack site into thinking they got paid by the merchant when in fact they didnt. And that'd require some technical hacking and manipulation, which would be questionable both ethically and legally.
If both CashBack sites get paid, then remit the consumers share, there's nothing wring with that...it's not like one CashBack site didn't get paid but you somehow argue they should have AND should pay you
There are so many middelemen in the CashBack chain it wouldn't be surprising to be able to accomplish stacking
Crazytree
Senior Member - 7K
posted: Sep. 5, 2010 @ 6:03p
Glitch99 said: flypaper said: BMWLVR82 said: djspray said: Crazytree said: I can barely get FW to honor its clickthroughs... the idea of multiple clickthroughs sounds like crazytalk! Yeah, they screwed me out of CB from Priceline on 3 flights I booked because they said I had clicked through Kayak to book the flight. I had clicked through Kayak....12 hours prior. Their suggestion was to clear all cookies before clicking through their links. Yeah, OK.
If that's what they said, that's what happened.
It's a very simple bottom line when it comes to paying out for CashBack. If we get paid, you get paid.
They being Kayak or FatWallet? The system isn't perfect on either end.They being the merchant. Someone's referal info is included with the order, that's who gets paid the referal commission.
I'm fairly certain that stacking would only be successful if you could trick the second CashBack site into thinking they got paid by the merchant when in fact they didnt. And that'd require some technical hacking and manipulation, which would be questionable both ethically and legally.My problem was that Dell refused to pay... and nobody was going to bat for me over $30. I called Dell and they told me to talk to the referrer. The referrer told me to talk to Dell. Ultimate Catch-22.
There are a few of CashBack sites that allow this, but posting them on this site would be suicide. Bing was not the only one, and is/was not the best of breed either. No PMs just look around chief.
Has anyone used mydealsandcoupons.com? How do they offer such high amounts back (though the amounts have been falling recently)? According to casbackholic, it has a bad reputation. Can anyone verify?
byteflow
New Member
posted: Sep. 7, 2010 @ 6:16p
miserly said: i do something similar with my hotel stays. go through FW to get hotel GC with FW CB. reserve room through FW for FW CB. pay with GC, bought with CC with CB. 3 CB opportunities for the same hotel stay. i do a lot of traveling, using OPM, so this is a nice benefit. i recently negotiated a new rate, about 40% off, directly with the hotel so i can't use FW CB, but still can get GC with FW CB and CC CB.
It ... makes perfect sense... But only if I read it very very slowly
Ok, gurus... I am about to do a buy it now on fleabay. What is my best plan of attack?
kjgco
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Sep. 7, 2010 @ 7:58p
MrNovember said: Ok, gurus... I am about to do a buy it now on fleabay. What is my best plan of attack?Are you registered for eBay Bucks? I believe everyone is eligible for the 2% bonus. Then there's Mr. Rebates, which is paying 4% thru 9/12 (max $30 per transaction). If you have a spouse or SO, they can earn a 20% referral fee. Ideally, you'd be paying with an AMEX gift card, purchased earlier thru Big Crumbs for a 1.6% rebate on your best CC (being aware of the PayPal limit on registering such gift cards)
aaron27 said: I used to be able to supplement my income by picking up good deals online and reselling them on eBay, cashing in FF miles for Gift Cards and selling on eBay for cash, or picking up free things online (through programs like ClubBing/Club Live) and selling. It was always a little tedious, but kind of fun because you're picking up extra cash.
eBay and PayPal operate as a total racket, now. They crowded out competing services and then jacked up fees the first chance they got. It might not legally fall under antitrust violations, but it sure seems similar. To sell one item, you have to pay one company (the eBay/PayPal racket) three sets of fees. Listing fee, final value fee, and PayPal transaction fee. Then, to protect yourself you have to pay the USPS extra for a tracking number. Otherwise the buyer will take receipt and claim you never shipped and without that tracking number, PayPal will take back the funds. Despite all the hurdles, it was still marginally worth it before. Now with huge fees, it doesn't make any sense at all.
The only positive is that this awful system should create demand for a lower-cost alternative. Google, Microsoft, and even Facebook should highly consider getting into online auctions.
I stopped selling stuff on eb@y a couple years ago. Margins weren't worth the hassle of all the fees.
But I'm still amazed at what you can buy on eb@y that doesn't seem to make the buyers any money. I.e. I just bought a bb screen shield for $1.37 and USB car charging adapter for $2.25. Both were buy it now and free shipping and shipped from overseas. WTF is the profit margin and how much are these buyers moving to make it worth it?
lovely
Senior Member
posted: Sep. 7, 2010 @ 8:58p
If you have any cc that gives CashBack at grocery stores, buy eBay GC at grocery store.
Citi Driver's Edge 3% x 2 with mileage redemption = 6% buy through MrRebates 4% eBay bucks 2% Total 12% back.
kjgco said: Ideally, you'd be paying with an AMEX gift card, purchased earlier thru Big Crumbs for a 1.6% rebate on your best CC (being aware of the PayPal limit on registering such gift cards)
Excuse my ignorance, but could you clarify this part?
kjgco
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Sep. 7, 2010 @ 9:12p
MrNovember said: kjgco said: Ideally, you'd be paying with an AMEX gift card, purchased earlier thru Big Crumbs for a 1.6% rebate on your best CC (being aware of the PayPal limit on registering such gift cards)
Excuse my ignorance, but could you clarify this part?If you're referring to the PayPal issue, they apparently have a lifetime limit of 16 cards that can be registered to one acct. I discovered this not long ago; the Add a Card option under my profile suddenly stopped working, and when I called they confirmed it. I looked through their T&C, but found no reference to it.
dpid said: aaron27 said: I used to be able to supplement my income by picking up good deals online and reselling them on eBay, cashing in FF miles for Gift Cards and selling on eBay for cash, or picking up free things online (through programs like ClubBing/Club Live) and selling. It was always a little tedious, but kind of fun because you're picking up extra cash.
eBay and PayPal operate as a total racket, now. They crowded out competing services and then jacked up fees the first chance they got. It might not legally fall under antitrust violations, but it sure seems similar. To sell one item, you have to pay one company (the eBay/PayPal racket) three sets of fees. Listing fee, final value fee, and PayPal transaction fee. Then, to protect yourself you have to pay the USPS extra for a tracking number. Otherwise the buyer will take receipt and claim you never shipped and without that tracking number, PayPal will take back the funds. Despite all the hurdles, it was still marginally worth it before. Now with huge fees, it doesn't make any sense at all.
The only positive is that this awful system should create demand for a lower-cost alternative. Google, Microsoft, and even Facebook should highly consider getting into online auctions.
I stopped selling stuff on eb@y a couple years ago. Margins weren't worth the hassle of all the fees.
But I'm still amazed at what you can buy on eb@y that doesn't seem to make the buyers any money. I.e. I just bought a bb screen shield for $1.37 and USB car charging adapter for $2.25. Both were buy it now and free shipping and shipped from overseas. WTF is the profit margin and how much are these buyers moving to make it worth it?
Don't think of these buyers as a guy's operation out of his home. Wholesale operations in Hong Kong and whatnot will have a side business from their existing space and ship out thousands of items daily. Even with small profit margins they are still hitting enough volume to make it worthwhile.
kjgco said: MrNovember said: kjgco said: Ideally, you'd be paying with an AMEX gift card, purchased earlier thru Big Crumbs for a 1.6% rebate on your best CC (being aware of the PayPal limit on registering such gift cards)
Excuse my ignorance, but could you clarify this part?If you're referring to the PayPal issue, they apparently have a lifetime limit of 16 cards that can be registered to one acct. I discovered this not long ago; the Add a Card option under my profile suddenly stopped working, and when I called they confirmed it. I looked through their T&C, but found no reference to it.
Oh thanks. Looks like there's a 3.95 charge from AMEX, so I'd have to buy a huuuge card to make it worthwhile.
has anyone ever filed a dispute for an item paid for in full or in part by eBay giftcards?
kjgco
Senior Member - 1K
posted: Sep. 7, 2010 @ 10:45p
scripta said: has anyone ever filed a dispute for an item paid for in full or in part by eBay giftcards?I have, on a least a couple of occasions when the seller failed to deliver. The value of the card(s) gets credited back to the PayPal acct you used to make payment once the dispute is resolved in your favor.
Beernuts82 said: Anybody having any luck getting around the $500 eBay Bucks limitation? I've maxed out the past 2 quarters, but don't want to risk a ban by creating another account. However, a family member has said I could use their well established (circa 1999) account - any risk in this? I'd do it.
Disclaimer: By providing links to other sites, FatWallet.com does not guarantee, approve or endorse the information or products available at these sites, nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked site to FatWallet.com.
Members of our community may attach files to a post in accordance with the User Agreement. FatWallet is not responsible for the content, accuracy, completeness or validity of any information contained in any attached file. Files have *not* been scanned for viruses. Be especially wary of Excel files which may contain malicious content.